StateImpact: BoomTown

Trucks on Towanda's Main Street (Photo by NPR's Becky Lettenberger)

 

Presentation-wise,”BoomTown” is the most ambitious project I tackled at StateImpact. Working with photographer Becky Lettenberger, developer Wes Lindamood and editor Chris Swope, I tried to answer two basic questions:

  • How has the Marcellus Shale boom changed Towanda, Pennsylvania?
  • What happens next?

You can see what we came up with here. 

StateImpact: Snakes On A Drilling Rig

Jobs on natural gas drilling sites can have funny names: there are roustabouts, mud men, doodlebuggers and snake wranglers.

That last one – snake wrangler – is exactly what it sounds like, as I reported earlier this year:

How did I find Matt? A chance encounter in an over-booked Williamsport hotel. I blogged about the episode in June:

Continue reading

StateImpact: Perilous Pathways

An abandoned well near Allegheny National Forest

When Shell admitted a geyser of natural gas and water that sprang up near a Marcellus Shale site in Tioga County this summer was likely caused by the intersection of an active drilling site and an abandoned gas well, that led to a couple obvious questions:

  • Just how many of these abandoned wells are there in Pennsylvania?
  • How many are located near active drilling sites?

The answers took several months — and several thousand words — to figure out. My reporting on the topic eventually led to a four-part series called “Perilous Pathways: The Danger of Drilling Near Abandoned Wells.” The series ran in October, with a companion radio piece airing on Morning Edition in November. 

Part 1: How Drilling Near An Abandoned Well Produced A Methane Geyser

Part 2: Behind The Staggering Number Of Abandoned Wells In Pennsylvania

Part 3: Hunting For Hidden Wells

Part 4: Abandoned Wells Don’t Factor Into Pennsylvania’s Permitting Process

Here’s the broadcast piece that ran on Pennsylvania’s public radio stations:

Finally, click here to listen to the version that ran on NPR’s Morning Edition.

 

StateImpact: Methane Migration Means Flammable Puddles And 30-Foot Geysers

A Bradford County man lights a jar of methane on fire. The gas has been seeping onto his property since May.

 

In two northeast Pennsylvania communities, methane gas has been leaking into water wells and streams for several months. State regulators think the migrating methane is coming from nearby natural gas drilling operations.

Here’s StateImpact Pennsylvania’s close look at how stray gas is disrupting life for people who live near faulty wells:

Last Sep­tem­ber, Chesa­peake Energy CEO Aubrey McClen­don declared to a Philadel­phia energy con­fer­ence that the prob­lem of methane migrat­ing through the ground near nat­ural gas drilling sites had been fixed.  “Prob­lem iden­ti­fied. Prob­lem solved,” he told an industry-heavy crowd at the Philadel­phia Con­ven­tion Center.

Nearly a year later,  Brad­ford County res­i­dent Michael Leighton is wor­ried about the flam­ma­ble gas seep­ing into his woods.

Leighton lives about a half-mile from a Chesa­peake Energy well that Pennsylvania’s Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion sus­pects leaked methane gas through holes in its cas­ing. For more than two months, gas has been gur­gling into creeks and wet­lands on Leighton’s prop­erty. That’s in addi­tion to the methane in Leighton’s water well, and the methane in his basement.

“It both­ers me because this is a big invest­ment for us,” said Leighton, who moved with his wife to Leroy Town­ship from Chester County two years ago. “This is our retire­ment home. I built this house, built the barn.” Now, he’s wor­ried about drink­ing his own water. “They say it’s safe to drink, but I hesitate.”

Chesa­peake isn’t the only energy com­pany the Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion is inves­ti­gat­ing for ongo­ing methane migra­tion prob­lems. 13 miles west of Leroy, in Union Town­ship, Tioga County, Shell is try­ing to stop a month-old sus­pected methane leak by flar­ing off nat­ural gas and plug­ging an aban­doned gas well dis­cov­ered near its drilling site.

Making Spot News Great

 

Governor Corbett brought a lot of people to today's press conference

 

This Transom post by Robert Smith and Phyllis Fletcher is the best broadcast journalism guide I’ve read in years. Their argument: just because a newscast spot lasts 60 seconds doesn’t mean it has to be boring.

By writing strong, using short sentences, focusing on one or two main points, and being creative with sound, you can tell a great story.

My favorite spots from the post: Robert Smith’s St. Patrick’s Day report and Zoe Chace’s autotuned piece.

Here’s my first attempt at spicing up a spot news story:

Governor Corbett brought a lot of friends — and some opponents –  to an event aimed at driving up support for a nearly one-point-seven billion dollar tax break he wants to give Royal Dutch Shell. StateImpact Pennsylvania’s Scott Detrow reports. 

On Patrol In Taji Market: July 30, 2009

In 2009 I spent the month of July embedded with Pennsylvania’s 56h Stryker Brigade. The soldiers were stationed in Taji, about 20 miles north of Baghdad.

The goal of the project was to show listeners what life is like for deployed soldiers. I rode along on missions, but also filed stories on how the guardsmen and women killed time on base.

This is a report about a routine patrol that almost took a wrong turn:

Johnson : Kennedy Administration Civil Rights :: Biden : Obama Administration Civil Rights

I’m about halfway through Robert Caro’s Passage of Power. I had the good fortune of being smack in the middle of the section on Lyndon Johnson’s Vice Presidential years when Joe Biden forced President Obama’s hand on gay marriage.

Kennedy benched Johnson, and Johnson coped with the sudden loss of power by turning passive. But there was one issue where LBJ actively worked to influence policy: civil rights. Caro recounts how Johnson cornered Ted Sorensen, offering advice on how to craft and introduce a civil rights bill. The marginal victory of integrating just one Florida dinner animated the listless Johnson, who pushed for Kennedy to take a more active stand on the issue.

The New Yorker’s George Packer summarizes the obvious parallels between Johnson’s and Bidens’ (unsolicited) roles as intra-administration agitators:

Continue reading

StateImpact: Krancer’s Letters

DEP Secretary Mike Krancer

Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection Secretary doesn’t pull his punches. Here’s my latest report on the blunt – at time angry -  letters Mike Krancer has written to the Environmental Protection Agency:

When the EPA began launched an inves­ti­ga­tion of whether or not the water in Dimock, Susque­hanna County was safe to drink, Krancer essen­tially told EPA Admin­is­tra­tor Lisa Jack­son she didn’t know what she was talk­ing about.

“We real­ize and rec­og­nize that EPA is very new to all of this and the EPA’s under­stand­ing of the facts and sci­ence behind this activ­ity is rudi­men­tary,” he wrote. “For­tu­nately, Penn­syl­va­nia is not new to all of this and we have a long his­tory of expe­ri­ence at over­see­ing and reg­u­lat­ing oil and nat­ural gas extrac­tion activ­i­ties in our state, includ­ing hydraulic fracturing.”

The let­ter ques­tioned the EPA’s motives, call­ing the agency’s inves­ti­ga­tion of pos­si­ble fracking-related pol­lu­tion in Pavil­lion, Wyoming a “rush to conclusions.”

The ten­sion goes beyond nat­ural gas drilling. In 2010, EPA began review­ing the per­mits the state issues for water-related coal min­ing oper­a­tions. The fed­eral agency was essen­tially look­ing over Pennsylvania’s shoul­der as it set coal extrac­tion guide­lines. In a let­ter to regional EPA Admin­is­tra­tor Shawn Garvin, Krancer expressed his “dis­may,” called the new prac­tice “dis­con­cert­ing,” “unnec­es­sary” and “over­reach­ing,” writ­ing, “this ele­vated scrutiny by EPA has lit­tle or no envi­ron­men­tal or sci­en­tific basis and is con­trary to almost three decades of past rela­tion­ship between EPA and DEP.

’08 Clinton Endorsements Yield Long-Term Dividends For PA Pols

Image Via WikiCommons

The Huffington Post has a smart piece today on the ongoing legacy of Pennsylvania’s drawn-out 2008 presidential primary battle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

In short: Pennsylvania politicians who endorsed Clinton are cashing in their I.O.U.s with the counrty’s 42nd president. Obama-backers are being left out in the cold.

The most recent example comes from Kathleen Kane’s win over Patrick Murphy in yesterday’s Democratic Attorney General primary. Murphy entered the race with the backing of Democratic power brokers like Ed Rendell and Michael Nutter. Kane’s largest asset: her husband’s willingness to pour company money into her campaign. But Kane had worked for Clinton during the 2008 race, and called in a favor with former President Bill Clinton.

From the HuffPo article:

Continue reading

Is It Time For A War On Outrage?

 

The Inquirer’s Tom Fitzgerald is outraged – outraged! – by all the outrage:

 Manufacturing may be struggling in many American places, but the factories of the political-industrial complex are adding shifts, busy stamping out fresh outrage, packaged for easy digestion on Twitter and cable news.

The latest template is “war.”

The race between President Obama and Republican Mitt Romney has been dominated in recent days by a GOP “war on women,” Democrats’ war on stay-at-home moms, rocker Ted Nugent’s declaring war on the administration. It also has gone to the dogs – as pets and as dinner.

Each outburst is flanked by demands that one side or the other denounce somebody’s outrageous statements, followed by declarations that the refusal to denounce said statements reveals dark truths that will turn off swing voters. And so on.